92% of readers believe that the remains found in Scurry County are Haileys.
When the known liar tells the truth, and it is not believed, the anger within the reaction is often disproportionate to the topic at hand.
This is simply because the liar, having been caught on "a" as well as on "b", finally reports something truthful ("c") and is now filled with a pseudo form of "righteous indignation" and will often go to great lengths to verify the truthful statement, replete with sensitivity indicators and emphasis.
Q. Why such an over reaction?
A. The liar feels the sting of being caught and even though truthful sentence, "c" does not negate the lies told in "a" and "b", the liar feels that the mantle of "liar" is now overthrown, completely, and exhaustively "proves" the subject to be a truthful person.
The anger also shows the rage of insult over having been previously undraped. It is so that the topic ("c") being truthful, will now make others "pay" for the embarrassment of having been caught on "a" and upon "b", with a desire to have "all forgotten now", and new status of "truthful" granted.
Here is the exchange between Billie Dunn and Nancy Grace, who has grown frustrated with the deceptive responses and does not believe Dunn any longer:
GRACE: Well, I don`t know what to believe, either, because I`m getting all these different stories about you having a New Year`s Eve party, and you`re high when you go take the polygraph. Let me ask you this. Let`s get back to the facts. When was the last time you absolutely are positive you saw Hailey?
Note that Nancy Grace frames the words "you having a New Year's Eve party" within her sentence recognizing that the gathering, the serving of alcohol, and the watching of the ball drop define a party, even if Dunn wishes to deny. She moves past this, but then asks the simple question about the last time Dunn saw Hailey.
BILLIE DUNN: I saw her Sunday night.
Dunn did not address the accusations of telling different stories, having a party, and being high for the polygraph. Billie Dunn does not refute it and Nancy Grace knows this.
"I saw her Sunday night" is a very strong statement. This is likely true. She saw her Sunday night. What did she see? Was it an alive Hailey? Was it a dead Hailey?
This answer, "I saw her Sunday night" should be considered a very important sentence from Billie Dunn.
Objection: It is without sensitivity indicators. Why do you call it "very important"?
Answer: Billie Dunn has given us lots of statements and even against the objection of her attorney, continues to. Billie Dunn's method of deception is to add many words to her answers, and to go beyond the boundary of the question.
It may be that when she gives a short answer, we should pay even closer attention to the fact that it is not the norm for her, but a break in her pattern. This is a critical part of her story. We now get to the point of the most chilling words as Billie Jean Dunn reaches into her memory to choose words, yet it is the addition of one single word which tells us the worst possible news.
GRACE: What time, 10:00 PM?
Mistake. She should ask "what time?" without giving the subject the answer.
BILLIE DUNN: Probably around 10:00.
Two qualifiers for 10:00, "probably" and "around" making it a weak assertion.
GRACE: Now, was that when you looked in her room and it is was dark and you thought she was lying in her bed?
Please note that when this statement is viewed in light of all the other statements made to this point, the analyst is confronted with something possibly horrific.
What is Billie Dunn describing?
Use the standard principles of analysis including body posture, reporting what did not happen, was not thought, and the standard sensitivity principle.
Here we have the critical "cluster of blues" that can solve a case. Here Billie Dunn is inviting us in to see what she saw, with her own eyes:
Note that Nancy Grace frames the words "you having a New Year's Eve party" within her sentence recognizing that the gathering, the serving of alcohol, and the watching of the ball drop define a party, even if Dunn wishes to deny. She moves past this, but then asks the simple question about the last time Dunn saw Hailey.
BILLIE DUNN: I saw her Sunday night.
Dunn did not address the accusations of telling different stories, having a party, and being high for the polygraph. Billie Dunn does not refute it and Nancy Grace knows this.
"I saw her Sunday night" is a very strong statement. This is likely true. She saw her Sunday night. What did she see? Was it an alive Hailey? Was it a dead Hailey?
This answer, "I saw her Sunday night" should be considered a very important sentence from Billie Dunn.
Objection: It is without sensitivity indicators. Why do you call it "very important"?
Answer: Billie Dunn has given us lots of statements and even against the objection of her attorney, continues to. Billie Dunn's method of deception is to add many words to her answers, and to go beyond the boundary of the question.
It may be that when she gives a short answer, we should pay even closer attention to the fact that it is not the norm for her, but a break in her pattern. This is a critical part of her story. We now get to the point of the most chilling words as Billie Jean Dunn reaches into her memory to choose words, yet it is the addition of one single word which tells us the worst possible news.
GRACE: What time, 10:00 PM?
Mistake. She should ask "what time?" without giving the subject the answer.
BILLIE DUNN: Probably around 10:00.
Two qualifiers for 10:00, "probably" and "around" making it a weak assertion.
GRACE: Now, was that when you looked in her room and it is was dark and you thought she was lying in her bed?
Please note that when this statement is viewed in light of all the other statements made to this point, the analyst is confronted with something possibly horrific.
What is Billie Dunn describing?
Use the standard principles of analysis including body posture, reporting what did not happen, was not thought, and the standard sensitivity principle.
Here we have the critical "cluster of blues" that can solve a case. Here Billie Dunn is inviting us in to see what she saw, with her own eyes:
BILLIE DUNN: "I did see her in her room, but I saw her watching TV.
Monday morning, I looked in her room and it was dark and it looked like she was laying in bed. But I didn`t go touch her, make sure that was her. I just peeked in to make sure she was in bed to ease my mind and..."
1. "I did see her in her room, but..." The word but can refute, negate, or minimize what preceded it. What has caused her to make comparison by putting a pause in her sentence and insert, in less than a micro-second, the word "but"? This is allegedly Sunday night.
2. We have since learned that pornography made by Billie Dunn, was stored on the children's X- box.
3. The subject feels it is important enough to add in "TV"
4. The need to explain why:
In the SCAN technique from LSI, we give "so, since, to, therefore, because" the color coding blue as the highest level of sensitivity that can be found in a statement of someone reported what happened. It is here that the person has a need to tell us "why" something was done. This is often the solving of a case. A single "blue" is a strong sensitivity indicator but two or more "blues" is called a "cluster of blues" in which the information contained with the cluster is the most critical information of a case. Just as we highlight "left" in blue, we highlight "because" in any form that seeks to explain why something was done.
If a question is "what did you do?" and it is answered with an explanation "why", it is critical.
Here we have three blues in one short statement and come to the most important part of everything she had told us.
We are at the most critical point of what happened to Hailey, as described by her mother.
Note that she doesn't tell us that Hailey was laying in bed, but rather says it looked like she was laying in bed. This is how she appeared to her mother.
Most might say "she was laying in bed" but she said it only "looked like she was laying in bed"; as if she is viewing a corpse, who looks peaceful, like as if she is sleeping. She could not bring herself to say she was laying in bed because Hailey was deceased and her corpse looked "like" rather than "was laying" in bed.
This one small word, "like", means to compare, is critical and it is why attorneys do not let guilty clients speak out on television.
She was viewing a corpse. What do most people NOT do to a corpse? She is consistent here:
2. We have since learned that pornography made by Billie Dunn, was stored on the children's X- box.
3. The subject feels it is important enough to add in "TV"
4. The need to explain why:
In the SCAN technique from LSI, we give "so, since, to, therefore, because" the color coding blue as the highest level of sensitivity that can be found in a statement of someone reported what happened. It is here that the person has a need to tell us "why" something was done. This is often the solving of a case. A single "blue" is a strong sensitivity indicator but two or more "blues" is called a "cluster of blues" in which the information contained with the cluster is the most critical information of a case. Just as we highlight "left" in blue, we highlight "because" in any form that seeks to explain why something was done.
If a question is "what did you do?" and it is answered with an explanation "why", it is critical.
Here we have three blues in one short statement and come to the most important part of everything she had told us.
We are at the most critical point of what happened to Hailey, as described by her mother.
Note that she doesn't tell us that Hailey was laying in bed, but rather says it looked like she was laying in bed. This is how she appeared to her mother.
Most might say "she was laying in bed" but she said it only "looked like she was laying in bed"; as if she is viewing a corpse, who looks peaceful, like as if she is sleeping. She could not bring herself to say she was laying in bed because Hailey was deceased and her corpse looked "like" rather than "was laying" in bed.
This one small word, "like", means to compare, is critical and it is why attorneys do not let guilty clients speak out on television.
She was viewing a corpse. What do most people NOT do to a corpse? She is consistent here:
Next Billie states what she didn't do, touch her.
That which is reported in the negative is important.
Billie didn't touch what looked like it was sleeping in the bed.
Ask yourself in what circumstance you would touch something to make sure what it was.
Would you touch your child to make sure it was him or her in bed?
Hailey is dead and Billie Dunn cannot bring herself to enter the room and touch her.
She cannot do it.
Most people do not like touching a dead body. Dead bodies can look "like" they are sleeping but people do not like to touch them. Even a dead dog in the street: people often poke it with a stick, rather than directly touch it.
Billie Dunn is speaking to you.
She is taking you, the listener, in with her, back to the next morning that, whatever happened the night before, Hailey did not wake up and now is there, as if she was "like" laying in bed but she was not asleep.
For her, the body looked "like" it was asleep.
That which is reported in the negative is important.
Billie didn't touch what looked like it was sleeping in the bed.
Ask yourself in what circumstance you would touch something to make sure what it was.
Would you touch your child to make sure it was him or her in bed?
Hailey is dead and Billie Dunn cannot bring herself to enter the room and touch her.
She cannot do it.
Most people do not like touching a dead body. Dead bodies can look "like" they are sleeping but people do not like to touch them. Even a dead dog in the street: people often poke it with a stick, rather than directly touch it.
Billie Dunn is speaking to you.
She is taking you, the listener, in with her, back to the next morning that, whatever happened the night before, Hailey did not wake up and now is there, as if she was "like" laying in bed but she was not asleep.
For her, the body looked "like" it was asleep.
Now note that Billie "peeked in" to make sure she was in bed to ease her mind. I believe this is true.
Why did Billie need to ease her mind? There was no report of a missing child. There was nothing that we know of, according to her story, that would cause her a need for comfort.
Something had happened to Hailey that Billie needed comfort and something to ease her mind.
There had been drugs the night before, we know that. She even stopped off, like a dutiful daughter, to ask her own mother if she needed drugs and then used the ATM to empty her account to buy drugs. This is something Nancy Grace would soon learn, too.
Hailey did not go to her bed, peacefully, the night before. If that was the case, there would be no reason to "ease" her mother's mind. By this time, the mother was in need of comfort and
reassurance.
There is nothing to soothe or calm, just a sleeping teenager.
What about Hailey being in bed caused Billie's mind to need to be put at ease?
This is what it means to let Billie Dunn guide you with her words. These may be the most important words in the case.
She said that she needed her mind to be put at ease, even though she claimed to last see Hailey, in her own home, at 10PM the night before, watching TV.
No problem reported.
In order to have your mind eased, your mind must be at unease.
Something must happen to put your mind at unease.
Hailey was watching TV at 10PM the night before.
Between 10PM that night, and 6AM the following morning, something upset the mind of Billie Dunn, in which she needed to have her mind eased.
Her choice of words are odd if you think nothing happened, but are perfectly fitting if you believe she and Shawn killed Hailey.
Here Billie Dunn has given herself away, in her attempt to use a multitude of words to make her sound innocent. SCAN's "Cluster of Blues" is the most critical point of her statement.
I believe that the only thing that could ease her troubled mind would be Shawn ridding them of the evidence.
Why did Billie need to ease her mind? There was no report of a missing child. There was nothing that we know of, according to her story, that would cause her a need for comfort.
Something had happened to Hailey that Billie needed comfort and something to ease her mind.
There had been drugs the night before, we know that. She even stopped off, like a dutiful daughter, to ask her own mother if she needed drugs and then used the ATM to empty her account to buy drugs. This is something Nancy Grace would soon learn, too.
Hailey did not go to her bed, peacefully, the night before. If that was the case, there would be no reason to "ease" her mother's mind. By this time, the mother was in need of comfort and
reassurance.
There is nothing to soothe or calm, just a sleeping teenager.
What about Hailey being in bed caused Billie's mind to need to be put at ease?
This is what it means to let Billie Dunn guide you with her words. These may be the most important words in the case.
She said that she needed her mind to be put at ease, even though she claimed to last see Hailey, in her own home, at 10PM the night before, watching TV.
No problem reported.
In order to have your mind eased, your mind must be at unease.
Something must happen to put your mind at unease.
Hailey was watching TV at 10PM the night before.
Between 10PM that night, and 6AM the following morning, something upset the mind of Billie Dunn, in which she needed to have her mind eased.
Her choice of words are odd if you think nothing happened, but are perfectly fitting if you believe she and Shawn killed Hailey.
Here Billie Dunn has given herself away, in her attempt to use a multitude of words to make her sound innocent. SCAN's "Cluster of Blues" is the most critical point of her statement.
I believe that the only thing that could ease her troubled mind would be Shawn ridding them of the evidence.
0 comments:
Post a Comment